Some people wonder how much expectation of privacy there is when flying aircraft in the airspace of the United States. This cuts two ways: expectations of privacy of those persons (pilots and passengers) flying in their aircraft and expectations of homeowners on the ground being flown over. Expectations of Privacy of Pilots Many incorrectly assume […]
Explore More
Case No. 2015-GL-15-0096 AMENDED Dear XXXXXX: Based upon the following facts and circumstances, it appears that XXXX has violated the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration for the following reasons: 1. On or about August 15, 2015, XXXX operated an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) in the vicinity of the Conway Community Recreational Center, St. Paul, […]
Explore MoreORDER OF ASSESSMENT You were advised through a Notice of Proposed Assessment, dated December 3, 2014, that the FAA proposed to assess a civil penalty in the amount of $2,200.00. After considering all the evidence presently a part of this proceeding, including the information presented by you, and pursuant to the settlement agreement reached between […]
Explore More Case No. 201650630005 NOTICE OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT Based on the following facts and circumstances, it appears that you violated the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration: 1. On or about October18, 2015, you operated a Dronada FoxTech:D-130, an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) as defined in Section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of […]
Explore More Case No. 201680630006 Based on the following facts and circumstances, it appears that you violated the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration: 1. On or about October 18, 2015, you operated a Tarot 680 Pro, an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) as defined in Section 331 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (Public Law […]
Explore More© jrupprechtlaw.com
