Indemnification Agreements and Drone Pilots

indemnification-clauses-drone-pilots-1

We all hear about people providing financial advice to others and say, “Don’t ever co-sign a loan for another person.”  We immediately understand the bad idea of getting all of the downside risk exposure while the other person gets all of the benefits. But a very analogous scenario happens in business all the time. It happens when people sign indemnification agreements.

What is an indemnification agreement?

It’s where one or more parties agree to indemnify one or more parties. Here is a good definition of indemnify from the Legal Information Institute run by Cornell Law School:

“To indemnify, also known as indemnity or indemnification, means compensating a person for damages or losses they have incurred or will incur related to a specified accident, incident, or event. Typically, parties make a written agreement in which one party (indemnitor) promises to indemnify the other party (indemnitee) for future specified losses.”

You all deal with these agreements every day. They are called insurance policies. The insurance company agrees to indemnify you, in exchange for money, in the event of something that happens in the contract (like a car wreck).  Insurance contracts are really just ways to transfer risk to another party for money. The big difference between insurance companies and some businesses is the insurance company takes on the risk ALWAYS in exchange for money.

When dealing with large companies or government entities, these indemnification clauses can be extremely one-sided and horrible. You basically become an insurance company to the other party. Many people do not fully understand the severe consequences that can result.  Consider what Proverbs 11:15 says,

Whoever puts up security for a stranger will surely suffer harm, but he who hates striking hands in pledge is secure.

NOT signing indemnification agreements is how you build a long-lasting, secure business. This is why I don’t sign these agreements with clients. One client tried to get me to sign an updated contract. I fired that client and I sleep great every night knowing I don’t have to worry about dealing with them and their long lasting liability. Why build a business to just have some contract term take it away from you?

Sample Indemnification Agreement

Here is some sample language of what an indemnification agreement could look like:

1. **Indemnification**
1.1 The Indemnifying Party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Indemnified Party, its officers, directors, employees, agents, and assigns from and against any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), claims, demands, suits, actions, or proceedings (each a “Claim” and collectively “Claims”) arising out of or related to any alleged violations of laws or regulations by the Indemnifying Party.

2. **Defense of Claims**
2.1 The Indemnifying Party shall assume the defense of any Claim brought against the Indemnified Party, including the appointment of legal counsel reasonably acceptable to the Indemnified Party, and shall bear all costs and expenses incurred in connection with such defense.
2.2 The Indemnified Party shall promptly notify the Indemnifying Party in writing of any Claim for which indemnification is sought under this Agreement. Failure to provide such notice shall not relieve the Indemnifying Party of its indemnification obligations hereunder except to the extent that the Indemnifying Party is materially prejudiced by such failure.
2.3 The Indemnified Party shall have the right to participate in the defense of any Claim at its own expense and with counsel of its own choosing, provided that such participation does not interfere with the Indemnifying Party’s defense obligations hereunder.
2.4 The Indemnifying Party shall not settle or compromise any Claim without the prior written consent of the Indemnified Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

Problems with Indemnification Agreements

Mere claims can trigger.

Some of the one-sided contracts I have seen have the clause triggered upon a simple claim. Yes, a simple email saying the person was negligent would trigger you to hire an attorney, at your sole expense, to defend the other party. Some people fly off the handle and send emails and letters threatening to do something or claiming something but really have no intention of doing anything.  You want an indemnification clause to be triggered upon an actual lawsuit, not a theoretical claim.

You could be on the hook for someone else’s negligence.

Yes, some one-sided contracts will have you indemnify the other party for the other party’s negligence.  I have seen these.

There are lesser forms of this where the indemnification agreement says you are not responsible when it’s 100% the other person’s fault, but in reality, the other party is going to say you were somehow 1% at fault and you are getting dragged back in defending the other party. It sounds good on paper but doesn’t work in reality.

Your insurance most likely won’t cover it.

Most insurance policies explicitly do not cover liability you incur on behalf of other contracts.  Luke Petty who sells drone insurance at Flight Light Assurance provided me with a copy of a drone insurance policy that shows this:

“This Policy does not apply to any of the following: . . . 5. Liability assumed under any contract or agreement.”

However, some insurance policies will cover this type of liability, provided you submit the contract to the insurance carrier, the carrier approves it, and pay an additional premium. This is great because you don’t have to go to the hassle of shopping for another policy. You are already set up from the beginning.

They can last a long time.

While some contracts end in the future, you are still on the hook for liability long after the project is over.  Consider the liability you take on when designing an aircraft, crafting manuals, training a pilot, etc.  You have some exposure as long as the aircraft flies, the manuals are used, and the pilots fly.

Mitigations

There are different things you can do to mitigate an indemnification agreement.

  • Carefully craft the terms of the indemnification with an attorney.
  • Have an attorney advise you on how enforceable the as-written terms are. Some contract language might be overly broad and be unenforceable in court. Why negotiate over a contract clause that might not be enforceable? But how much would that cost to litigate?
  • You can set up a separate operating business from your main business so as to isolate the risk from the contract.
  • Your intellectual property and equipment are owned by different business entities and licensed/leased to the operating entity, which has the indemnification clause obligation. You could also maybe do equity stripping of certain assets.
  • You can get an insurance policy that does cover some indemnification liability.

Solution

Work with a good business attorney who also works with a good drone attorney to craft a clause that protects your business.

Spray Drones for Sale

There are numerous spray drones for sale.

If you are shopping for one, you should read this article.


Legal Issues Surrounding Spray Drones for Sale

If you are flying under 55 pounds, the pilot determines the airworthiness under Part 107.

If you are flying 55 pounds and heavier, it is really important to choose a drone that has been previously determined under 49 USC 44807.  The FAA puts these at this docket.  https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FAA-2023-1271/document?sortBy=postedDate


Where are spray drones for sale? Where can I buy?

There are multiple sellers of drones. I highly suggest you reach out to the following companies regarding your spray drone needs:

 

Section 2203 Safety Statement

section-2203-safety-statement

Section 2203 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016 (Public Law 114-190) requires a manufacturer of a small (under 55 pound) unmanned aircraft shall make available to the owner at the time of delivery of the small unmanned aircraft the safety statement.

The safety statement required shall include:

(A) information about, and sources of, laws and regulations applicable to small unmanned aircraft;

(B) recommendations for using small unmanned aircraft in a manner that promotes the safety of persons and property;

(C) the date that the safety statement was created or last modified; and

(D) language approved by the Administrator regarding the following:

(i) A person may operate the small unmanned aircraft as a model aircraft (as defined in section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)) or otherwise in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration authorization or regulation, including requirements for the completion of any applicable airman test.

(ii) The definition of a model aircraft under section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note).

(iii) The requirements regarding the operation of a model aircraft under section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note).

(iv) The Administrator may pursue enforcement action against a person operating model aircraft who endangers the safety of the national airspace system.

The FAA has issued guidance on implementing this section. It is located here.  https://www.faa.gov/uas/programs_partnerships/manufacturers_toolkit

Keep in mind that as time goes on, the document will need to be updated to keep customers informed.  If you read the Section 2203 requirements, you can see that plainly as Section 336 is now located at 49 USC 44809. Contact me if you need help creating one of these safety statements.

What happens if the manufacturer does NOT comply?

A person who violates shall be liable for each violation to the United States Government for a civil penalty described in section 46301(a) of title 49, United States Code which says,

“A person is liable to the United States Government for a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 (or $1,100 if the person is an individual or small business concern)”

The price you pay is dependent on who or what you are. Let’s unpack these different scenarios:

An individual person. That’s you and me right now.  $1,100 per violation.

A small business manufacturer is $1,100.  So how do we figure out if the business is a small business.  49 USC 46301(i) says, “Small Business Concern Defined .— In this section, the term ‘small business concern’ has the meaning given that term in section 3 of the Small Business Act ( 15 U.S.C. 632).”

FAA Order 2150.3C , published 8/8/2023, provides a lot more information:

b. Definition of Small Business. The term “small business” as used in this order means a “small business concern” under 49 U.S.C. § 46301(i), which is defined under the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. § 632), as interpreted by the Small Business Administration (SBA). A small business is a business entity: (1) “organized for profit, with a place of business located in the U.S., and which operates primarily within the U.S. or which makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor”; (2) “which is independently owned and operated and which is not dominant in its field of operation”; and (3) that meets the size standards specified by the SBA. See 15 U.S.C. § 632; 13 C.F.R. §§ 121.101 and 121.105.

c. Size Limits for Small Businesses. The SBA defines small business concerns in tables according to the economic activity or industry in which they are primarily engaged (generally according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)) and number of employees or annual receipts. These limits are set by the SBA and can be found at 13 C.F.R. § 121.101. The SBA provides guidance on affiliates (13 C.F.R. § 121.103), calculating annual receipts (13 C.F.R. § 121.104), and calculating the number of employees (13 C.F.R. § 121.106). Limits for some common aviation entities are listed in Figure 9-7. If a business is engaged in more than one industry, AGC-300 counsel determines the primary industry in accordance with 13 C.F.R. § 121.107.

Figure 9-7: Small Business Maximum Size Limits
Business Subsector/Business Type (with NAICS code)                        Size Limit
Computer and Electronic Manufacturing (Subsector 334)
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System, and Instrument Manufacturing (334511)       1,250 employees

Business Subsector/Business Type (with NAICS code) Size Limit
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing (Subsector 336)
Aircraft Manufacturing (336411) 1,500 employees
Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing (336412) 1,500 employees
Other Aircraft Part and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing (336413) 1,250 employees

Air Transportation (Subsector 481)
Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation (481111) 1,500 employees
Scheduled Freight Air Transportation (481112) 1,500 employees
Nonscheduled Chartered Passenger Air Transportation (481211) 1,500 employees
Nonscheduled Chartered Freight Air Transportation (481212) 1,500 employees
Other Nonscheduled Air Transportation (481219) $16.5 million
annual receipts

Support Activities for Transportation (Subsector 488)
Other Airport Operations (other than Air Traffic Control) (488119) (includes airport operators) $35.0 million annual receipts
Freight Transportation Arrangement (488510) (includes freight forwarders for hazmat sanction calculations)  $16.5 million annual receipts
Except Non-Vessel Owning Common Carriers and Household  Goods Forwarders $30.0 million annual receipts
Other Support Activities for Air Transportation (488190) (includes repair stations) $35.0 million annual receipts

Educational Services (Subsector 611)
Flight Training (611512) $30.0 million annual receipts

d. Definition of Large Business. The term “large business” is not defined in a statute or regulation relevant to FAA legal enforcement actions. As used in this order, a large business is any entity that does not meet the definition of a small business concern. However, an entity that is not a “small business concern” only because it is a not organized for profit will be treated, for purposes of sanction selection, as a small business. This does not affect which statutory maximum is applicable to the entity.

The Small Business Administration has much more information here. https://t.ly/LioCb

Table of Size Standards is located here.https://t.ly/cHnKO

FAA NPRM on False Statements, Omissions, or Incorrect Statements (RIN 2120-AL84)

drone regulations

On February 8, 2024, the FAA published another Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that applies to the drone community.

The drone community flies under Parts 89, 91, 107, 137 and rarely under 135. These regulations have differing levels of how they deal with bad actors making false information and omitting material information when filing paperwork to the FAA. The FAA is combining all of these different sets of regulations throughout all of the different parts into one place so as to fill in gaps and to make things consistent in prohibitions and in what type of sanctions the FAA can impose.

Comments on the proposed regulations are due by April 8, 2024. You can comment here. https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FAA-2024-0021/document

How does this apply to the drone community? Here are some easy examples:

  • Applying for a certificate waiver to fly over people and you intentionally left out certain things and/or worded things in such a way to sound like your drone would not cause much of an impact.
  • You are a manufacturer. You make false statements to the FAA regarding your product and it’s compliance with remote ID.
  • You are working on 44807 determination with the FAA and intentionally leaving out key facts about previous fly-aways or crashes.
  • You are registering the drone and make an inaccurate statement about ownership.
  • You are a consultant pretending to run a business out of a location you sold years prior.

Important Quotes

“The proposed rules in part 3 and part 402 would proscribe: (1) intentionally false or fraudulent statements; (2) productions, reproductions, or alterations for fraudulent purpose; (3) knowingly omitting or causing to be omitted a material fact; and (4) incorrect statements. Each prohibition is described in the “Discussion of the Proposal” section of this NPRM. Also, the proposed rule would standardize sanctions for violations of the falsification regulations under 14 CFR, chapters I and III, cited in this NPRM.”

“The term “falsification regulations” as used in this NPRM generically refers to a variety of provisions in 14 CFR parts 1–199 implemented over decades that variously prohibit the following: (1) fraudulent or intentionally false statements or entries; (2) any reproduction for fraudulent purpose; (3) any alteration, including alterations for fraudulent purpose; (4) knowingly concealing or causing to be concealed a material fact by omission; (5) concealing or causing to be concealed a material fact; (6) known omissions; (7) misleading statements; and (8) incorrect statements or entries upon which the FAA relied or could have relied. The term also refers to willful false statements prohibited in 14 CFR 413.17(c). A violation of these standards is referenced in this NPRM as “falsification-related” conduct. The proposed rulemaking would consolidate these nine categories of proscribed conduct into the four categories identified above.”

“A false statement is distinct from an intentionally false or fraudulent one. A false statement or entry [1] is one that is incorrect. An incorrect statement or entry is made when a person unknowingly provides false ( i.e., incorrect) information upon which the agency relies. Incorrect statements or entries are prohibited by 14 CFR 60.33(c)(1)–(2) and 67.403. In contrast, an intentional false statement is comprised of three elements: a (1) false statement, (2) in reference to a material fact,[2] (3) that is made with knowledge of its falsity.[3] A fraudulent statement or entry consists of the preceding three elements plus two additional elements: (1) an intent to deceive and (2) with action taken in reliance upon the representation.”


Proposed Language

Subpart D—Falsification, Reproduction, Alteration, Omission, or Incorrect Statements

§ 3.401 Applicability.

This subpart applies to any person subject to the requirements in subchapter A (except parts 1 and 3), subchapter C (except part 39), subchapter D, subchapter E (except parts 71 and 73), subchapter F (except parts 95 and 97), subchapter G (except part 110), subchapter H, and subchapter K (except parts 185, 187, 189 and 193), of this chapter.

§ 3.403 Falsification, reproduction, alteration, or omission.

(a) No person may make or cause to be made any fraudulent or intentionally false statement in:

(1) Any document in any format, submitted under any provision referenced in § 3.401, consisting of or related to any acceptance, application, approval, authorization, certificate, rating, declaration, designation, qualification, record, report, request for reconsideration, or similar; or

(2) Any document in any format that is kept, made, or used to show compliance with any requirement under the provisions referenced in § 3.401.

(b) No person may make or cause to be made any production, reproduction, or alteration, for fraudulent purpose, of:

(1) Any document in any format, submitted or granted under any provision referenced in § 3.401, consisting of or related to any acceptance, application, approval, authorization, certificate, rating, declaration, designation, qualification, record, report, request for reconsideration, or similar; or

(2) Any document in any format that is kept, made, or used to show compliance with any requirement under the provisions referenced in § 3.401.

(c) No person may knowingly omit, or cause to be omitted, a material fact in:

(1) Any document in any format, submitted under any provision referenced in § 3.401, consisting of or related to any acceptance, application, approval, authorization, certificate, rating, declaration, designation, qualification, record, report, request for reconsideration, or similar; or

(2) Any document in any format that is kept, made, or used to show compliance with any requirement under the provisions referenced in § 3.401.

(d) The commission by any person of an act prohibited under paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section is a basis for:

(1) Denying, suspending, modifying, revoking, rescinding, removing, or withdrawing any acceptance, application, approval, authorization, certificate, rating, declaration, designation, qualification, request for reconsideration, or similar, issued or granted by the Administrator and held by that person; or

(2) A civil penalty.

§ 3.405 Incorrect statement, or omission.

(a) No person may make or cause to be made a material incorrect statement, or omit or cause to be omitted a material fact, in:

(1) Any document in any format, submitted under any provision referenced in § 3.401, consisting of or related to any acceptance, application, approval, authorization, certificate, rating, declaration, designation, qualification, record, report, request for reconsideration, or similar; or

(2) Any document in any format that is kept, made, or used to show compliance with any requirement under the provisions referenced in § 3.401.

(b) A material incorrect statement, or omission of a material fact, in any document described in § 3.405(a)(1) and (2) may serve as a basis for denying, suspending, modifying, revoking, rescinding, removing, or withdrawing any acceptance, application, approval, authorization, certificate, rating, declaration, designation, qualification, request for reconsideration, or similar, issued or granted by the Administrator and held by that person.


Frequently Asked Questions

I’m a civil aircraft operator. Does this apply to me?

Yes, this would apply to a whole host of things such as registration, authorizations, exemptions, waivers, etc.  The term “person” is used which is defined in 14 CFR 1.1 as “an individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, association, joint-stock association, or governmental entity. It includes a trustee, receiver, assignee, or similar representative of any of them.”

I’m a public aircraft operator. Does this apply to me?

Yes. See the previous answer.